Sunday, June 12, 2011

Desert

Punishment for its own sake is harmful and stupid. A new concept of desert is called for. Beat this: What you deserve is what would make you better, in character, in consequence, and in wellness.

Monday, July 24, 2006

To Selene

I haven't been using this blog, but someone at the comic convention made me remember you because she looked like Death and she was beautiful, and it seems I can't comment on your blog, so I'm just leaving you a message here. I hope you understand how you can be beautiful and you stay beautiful. You're one of the people who really have wonderful lives to live. It would be a shame to waste that.

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Had a Thought, or, Another Way To Talk About Creativity

The encounter with the empirical world through science and the encounter with other people through social interaction each perform the dual functio of providing me with a degree of stability and control, and challenging me with new opportunities to grow and move forward as a person, in this way: Science is a process by which I can gain direct control (or at least effective anticipation) of well-defined classes of phenomena by comprehending them under an articulated framework (either instrumental or linguistic) whose range and efficacy can always be improved, and at the same time I am constantly reminded by the peripheral phenomena I must abstract away in the formation of such a framework that a wide world full of wonders still waits beyond it, where reasons continually accumlate for me to step outside it; Social interaction places me in contact with the other in a way that reminds and reassures me that, in spite of my existential solitude, there is an equally essential aspect of myself through which I need not be alone, and through which my actions and choices can acquire meaning in spite of my contingency, and at the same time, another person is always capable of presenting me with something new and totally unexpected, challening and inviting me to grow by accepting and engaging, and to risk having my time (if nothing more) wasted by inanities, trivialities, deceptions, et cetera. Art may be thought of as a kind of practice that might participate in any or all of thse processes, and extends their possible range and diversity- which might be another way to say "involves creativity".

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

The Heretic Sings

Reading from my old biology textbook today, I got to thinking about the vagueness that exists in the distinctions between species, and sometimes even between individual organisms and their environments, but seems to disappear as we probe deeper, to the level of protons, neutrons, electrons, etc. Whenever I think of things like this, the calm, diffident, good-humored and fearless voice of Richard Rorty is whispering in my ear, admonishing me to set aside the notion that we have finally "cut nature at the joints", that there even is any ultimate "nature of reality", that we ever escape the confines of language in the course of our understanding. It's very easy to misinterpret such warnings- as easy as it is to think there must be some madness in Friedrich Nietzsche's insisting that there is no world order in one breath, and in the next that everything proceeds by strict necessity (an important part of his quaintly fallacious proof of the Eternal Recurrence, which is no less interesting or impressive for being literally false). It is only to say that, without any need to seperate mind from matter, or things from their properties from their interactions with other things, or to place any part of nature in charge of another, from the very beginning everything has been right on its way without any supervision or explanation (or excuse), and it is the height of human folly that we hope to drag the whole grand scheme, the whole awesome and mysterious process, into our little state of affairs, to be encompassed in our hilariously anthropic little cosmologies, as though all of it has to have something to do with us. Over our entire history as a species, and in miniature over the life of every one of us, we have expected to find something familiar in our investigations of nature, to find reason reasoning back at us, to hear a louder and more kind or terrible "I am that I am" than we can muster for each other or ourselves, and again and again we have been horrified to uncover the absurdity and indifference of a nature that is profoundly alien to us. We have suffered this, and really only suffered from ourselves, but in time we have also learned a new reverence for this nature that grows ever more exotic to us, and for the great luck we have to be a part of it. If it is a good idea for us to set aside the notion of having cut nature at the joints, it is because, even if we have managed to do that, there's no bell that goes off when we get it right, no higher level we ascend to upon attaining that elusive prize; it won't look any different to us from what we were doing before. There is no special ring of Truth, and no royal road to it; there's still just us, whatever we are, doing what we do, with the mystery forever before us, laughing at the darkness when we can, and letting in the light when we are strong enough.

I'm sorry if it hurt to read this. It's been too long since I've written. Worries squelch creativity, but I had to do something to prove to myself that I'm still alive. I hope I've convinced you as well.

Saturday, December 10, 2005

Some hasty and vague scrawlings about luck

I haven't posted here in quite a while, so I'll place here some mildly coherent jottings I was impelled to earlier today:

Lucky- not that I could have been the other or even necessarily been other than what I am, but that what I am is not to my credit, nor finally to anyone's. This is what I think, looking upon the truly unfortunate: What I have, and you have not- can I think of it as any more mine than yours?

This sentiment is tempered by an understanding that, through my own creative activity and involvement, there is a satisfactory sense in which there is much that I have made mine, and will make mine, and at the same time, the plight of others does not immediately mean any obligation of mine. All this considered, it remains the case that an honest appraisal of my siutation in comparison to those of others impels me to share, or to place myself in a situation where I can share, the luck that is mine.


It felt like a bit of a handful to write that their plight does not entail my obligation: why do I feel so much like it does? At least in part, it's because I haven't done what it takes to make any of this luck mine; that I do not appreciate what I have, that I do not put it to good use. This is an easy thing to pass over in silence, but throughout this project I have cultivated (or willfully maintained) a sensitivity to this type of concern, and it will find an answer in practice.

Philosophy has always been a matter of practice for me: It is by striving to live up to what I know that I am able to learn more...